Hello Hobart! > I use BROWSE often. At the risk of throwing a monkey wrench into the > works, I'll add a few comments.
Thank you for writing down what I thought. Well, your first point may be a bit special, I regard browse first as data-presenter for interactive applications. But if it helps also to get something to the log of a disconnected machine, well done. :) On the other hand, what you ask for will take some effort. I am about to recode a xxxxLIST like application (to show files and content of dumps from HP-LIF disks), it takes its time until every detail is shiny as it should be. Browse main advantage is its speed, I use it to display converted data, that converts very slow, converting the whole file is too slow for interactive handling. But browse holds processing if there is enough data to display one screen and continues only when scrolling down. This way the user does not remark a delay, only when scrolling to the end. :( Drawback, what is shown as bullet point in Xedit and by cons/term shows as little upper 3 with browse. Grrrr! But only on a more up-to-date 3270. Again grrrr!! with more emphasis. Ciao.....Mike -- www.Ok.de - die kostenlose E-Mail Adresse
