On 11/3/2016 1:23 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > A current thread in REXX-TSO has me wondering, how do concurrent > Rexx stages avoid contention between their respective storage > managers and garbage collectors?
Do they have them? I thought their storage was all managed together in one big lump by the language processor, on both CMS and TSO. > And does Pipelines/Rexx guarantee that a reasonable amount > of free storage is available for a CMS stage? Ha! Both will happily consume storage until none is left. ¬R
