Mario Storti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi lispers, > > I'm writing a FEM (Finite Element Method) program > and I have already written a rather large library > in C++. > ... > Now, I ask you which of the Lisp implementations > is more suitable to be taken as language > extension, i.e. calling the C/C++ library from > Lisp. I have already some experience with Guile > and I want to know if there is something similar > in the Common Lisp side.
Maybe my project Femlisp (www.femlisp.org) could be of interest to you (even if it takes the approach of writing the complete FEM code in Common Lisp). It is not a parallel code, but offers a lot of flexibility in other directions. Nicolas. P.S.: For my approach, CLISP would be too slow, but as an extension language for C/C++ it should be preferable to CMUCL because it runs on much more platforms.
