Hello Marcin, thank you for the answer, it encouraged to recheck function-lambda-expression.
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:25:20 +0100 (BST) Marcin Tustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > > (function-lambda-expression function) will return you the > s-expression for the function text, unless it returns you nil. Returning > nill from this function is always allowed. Yes, it was retuning nil in my case. In order to demonstrate it I wrote a simple test, but realized that all is ok for the test. Now I'm going to reveal difference in loading the original code and the test code. > > If the result is non-nil, you can call macroexpand upon it > yourself. > > -- Oleg
