> Com MN PG P E B Consultant 3 wrote:
> > Actually, I did consider slime, and I do occasionally use emacs.
> > I was just looking for a more "lightweight" solution, such as
> > giving readline support to lisp, similar as it is done with clisp.
> 
> Perhaps the first question should be, if you "occasionally use
> emacs", then what do you use the rest of the time? How are you
> editing your lisp code now?

I have just started learning Lisp, and for most other code editing,
I use right now mainly Nedit and occasionally Kedit and Kate.

> IMHO if you are editing your code some other way, then indeed
> from that perspective *any* solution where step 1 is "first fire
> up emacs" is going to be "heavyweight"!

I had used Emacs a lot in past projects, so that's why I maybe go with
Slime. Editors, as always, are a matter of taste, and for that kind of
work I'm doing now, I have a slight preference for nedit. But as I said,
maybe I will go back to Emacs and try Slime. Maybe I will also try
one of the other solutions proposed here, and then will see what I will
end up with.

Thank you to all for giving so many suggestions.

Ronald


Reply via email to