Eric Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> "ew" == Edi Weitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ew> I'm wondering what the current status of the CMUCL documentation > ew> is. > > I regenerated the CMUCL User's Manual at the end of November: the PDF, > Postscript and online HTML versions are all from the same date. I forgot > to recreate the cmu-user-html tarball at that time, but I've fixed > that now. > > The other documents (Hemlock Manual, Hemlock Internals, Motif Manual, > Motif Internals, CMUCL Internals) haven't been updated for quite some > time. > > ew> Which one is the newest, i.e. the one which applies to the current > ew> release (if there are any relevant differences at all)? > > the latest documentation applies to the latest binaries, rather than to > the 18d release. We could maintain separate sets of documentation, but > in practice there are so few differences between them that I'm not > sure it's worth the bother. > > I'll try to clarify this point on the web page.
Thanks. You might want to add a date to the HTML version similar to the one in the last release or in the PDF file. Let me add that I think that the CMUCL documentation is of the same high quality than the software itself. This definitely is one of the finest "open source" projects out there! Cheers, Edi.
