I might have an A&H hatch to sell.  I need to check the dimensions, but it was 
new surplus black anodized, would have served as the main hatch aft of the mast 
on the 35-2 but decided to refurbish the old one.  Hole pattern is a bit 
different from the original as well

ALEX GIANNELIA

Phone (416) 203-9858
Fax       (416) 203-9843
Cell       (416) 529-0070

email: a...@airsensing.com
WEB: www.airsensing.com

-----Original Message-----
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of 
cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com
Sent: November 10, 2012 2:59 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: CnC-List Digest, Vol 82, Issue 21

Send CnC-List mailing list submissions to
        cnc-list@cnc-list.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
        cnc-list-ow...@cnc-list.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CnC-List digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re:  deck hatch leak (Mark G)
   2.  Heaving-to (Mark G)
   3. Re:  water tanks. (Colin Kilgour)
   4. Re:  Heaving-to (Ken Heaton)
   5.  Pelicans (Joe Della Barba)
   6. Re:  Pelicans (Rich Knowles)
   7. Re:  deck hatch leak (Rick Brass)
   8. Re:  deck hatch leak (LKL Architects)
   9. Re:  Heaving-to (Rick Brass)
  10. Re:  Heaving-to (Rick Brass)
  11. Re:  Heaving-to (Andrew Burton)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:10:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mark G <mjg...@comcast.net>
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List deck hatch leak
Message-ID:
        
<1873262350.11786.1352571038640.javamail.r...@sz0109a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


Rick,

I may take on the same project on my '73 25 Mk1 next spring.  According to A&H 
what I have is the "old style" XR200, which is a 20" square hatch.  My existing 
hatch doesn't leak, not under the frame, not under the acrylic  But the acrylic 
is badly crazed and the latches (threaded knobs) are missing.  Replacement 
hardware is no longer available for this hatch, and I've had no luck at marine 
consignment shops after 5 years of looking.  I've jury-rigged some latches.  So 
I guess you could say this project is primarily to improve the appearance of 
the hatch.

I recently salvaged '74 25 Mk1 hull #301 and took the hatch among other things. 
 My experience was the same: screws came out easily, frame required some prying 
with a putty knife, sealant appeared to be butyl.  According to A&H this is the 
newer style XR200.  As you said below the different generations of A&H hatches 
don't use the same hardware, hinges or frame.  A&H even said there is a 1/8" or 
1/4" difference in the overall size.

The hatch from the salvage boat is complete with all the hardware, but the 
acrylic is badly crazed.  On this hatch, the acrylic is screwed to the frame in 
8 places.  I assume this is a previous acrylic replacement.  There is also 
evidence it leaked under the acrylic as a previous owner applied lots of 
additional sealant.

I've got quotes from Select Plastics and Hammerhead Nautical to refurb the 
salvage hatch, or should I say, to replace the acrylic.  Has anyone attempted 
to reanodize or paint the frame?

What was your experience reinstalling the frame?  On the salvage boat the frame 
screws came out easily.  I suspect they were screwed directly into a soggy 
balsa core.  If it's the same on my boat, I'm thinking I may have to do a core 
repair before I can reinstall the hatch.  (I replaced the chainplates last year 
and that turned into a significant core repair.)  Did you have to do a core 
repair?  Did you fill the existing holes and drill new ones?  Is thru-bolting 
an option?  I'm concerned I may not get enough compression on the seal without 
thru-bolts.

If it wasn't for the missing hardware, I'd keep the existing hatch and replace 
the acrylic - either on the boat or by just removing the top of the hatch at 
the hinge

Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Brass <rickbr...@earthlink.net>
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Sent: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:11:26 -0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Stus-List deck hatch leak

Imzadi had the original 27? square A&H hatch on the foredeck. I Had bought a 
used hatch some time ago, and planned to refurb that hatch and install it on 
the existing frame (which did not leak). So my first question is why pull the 
frame if it isn?t leaking and you are planning to refurbish/reseal the lens in 
the hatch? For me, it turned out that there are older and newer style A&H 
hatches and that the hinge arrangement is different enough that my refurbished 
hatch would not fit the existing frame. I took out all of the screws holding 
the hatch down and tried to lift the frame ? no joy. The hatch frame was bedded 
with gray butyl (I scraped a small sample from under the edge to determine what 
the sealant was), but boy was it tenacious. Finally forced a putty knife 
between the frame and deck in several places to break the seal, and used a wide 
pry  bar as a lever the frame off the deck. My point is that the sealant could 
be butyl. And, of course, the second point is that when !
 you reinstall the frame DO NOT use 5200.  Rick BrassWashington, NC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/0d2341d2/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mark G <mjg...@comcast.net>
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List Heaving-to
Message-ID:
        
<1438155064.12320.1352572377739.javamail.r...@sz0109a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


After 6 years of experimenting on an infrequent basis I was finally able to 
easily and repeatedly heave-to my 25 Mk1 this year.  I sail with a 135-140% 
Genoa on a furler.  On the day everything clicked it was furled to about 
100-110%.  Since then, I have made furling the Genoa to 100-110% the first step 
of heaving-to.  It makes sense to me that, since heaving-to is all about 
balancing the sails, sail area forward would be a significant factor.  But on a 
boat without a furler this can't be accomplished without a sail change, etc.  
So I'm thinking the same thing might be accomplished by positioning the main 
sail with the sheet or the traveler.  Can anybody weigh in on their experience, 
particularly with the 25 Mk1?

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/7cf400dd/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:46:45 -0500
From: Colin Kilgour <charliekilo...@gmail.com>
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List water tanks.
Message-ID:
        <cakr-nkk+94omglpzfux5qr4kuyatr++gew+uwaraivnzkwn...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Dwight,

The high number I quote pertains only to cruisers who make passages or
who stay aboard for a long period of time.

With regard to folks who do weekends aboard or a 2 week coastwise
cruise - I'm sure many of them still do the bottled thing - but as you
point out - it's easy to do that when you don't have to worry about
storage, cost, or waste disposal.

Once those things become relevant though, using the tanks that C&C
gave you is the most practical solution.

Cheers,
Colin

(Disclosure: my wife used to swear by bottled water on board.   She
has since seen the light, but not without some marital angst! - and a
PurestOne filter)


On 11/10/12, dwight veinot <dwightvei...@hfx.eastlink.ca> wrote:
> Thanks for you response, Colin
>
> Based on what I have learned about some of your cruising experiences from
> this list I accept that you are much more qualified than I am to put a
> number on it.
>
> I am, however, surprised with such a high number.  Nonetheless, I think
> that
> I will remain a member of the minority on this practice.  I must add,
> however, that when I refer to "cruising" my experience has been coastal
> cruising, basically along the south shore of NS where many of our friends
> and relatives live so we are able to go ashore for visits and have the
> means
> to return to our own home and resupply with fresh water from our well and
> fresh vegetables and berries from our gardens every week or so.  Most of
> our
> cruising and live aboard time is in August and the majority of that time is
> spent in and around Chester, Mahone Bay, Lunenburg and Liverpool so it is
> not difficult and quite practical for us to do it the way we do.
>
> Using taste altering additives like Kool Aid, for example, doesn't change a
> thing for me so let it be known that whoever takes a drink on my boat they
> can be assured it will not include water from the boats built in storage
> tanks and now equipped with the advice I received recently I will be much
> more careful about what I drink when on board other boats. Usually that
> comes from sealed cans or bottles so it has not really been a big concern
> so
> far.
>
> And Cheers to you too
> Dwight
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Colin
> Kilgour
> Sent: November 9, 2012 7:11 PM
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List water tanks.
>
> Dwight,
>
> You wondered how many folks use their on board tanks for potable water.
> I say almost 100% of all cruisers.  Anything else is just impractical.
>
> And like Rich says, there are lots of ways to make the water taste better.
>
> Cheers
> Colin
>
> On 11/9/12, Knowles Richard <r...@sailpower.ca> wrote:
>> Oh. I forgot: I have a full house size activated charcoal filter between
> the
>> tanks and the pump. The rum kills the rest of the taste.
>>
>> Rich Knowles
>> INDIGO LF38
>> Halifax, NS.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2012-11-09, at 5:23 PM, dwight veinot <dwightvei...@hfx.eastlink.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> No one has died.death or illness is not the main point for me.the javex
>> would probably take care of that but.taste counts too!
>>
>> Dwight Veinot
>> C&C 35 MKII, Alianna
>> Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
>> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Rich
>> Knowles
>> Sent: November 9, 2012 5:13 PM
>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>> Subject: Re: Stus-List water tanks.
>>
>> I've been running water, javex, soap solution through every fall,
>> followed
>> by a good rinse and then plumbing alcohol. Rinse through thoroughly in
>> the
>> spring and add a half cup of javex to each tank. 3 x 30 gals. Had the
>> boat
>> 15 years, drunk the water, used it for cooking and mixing drinks. No one
> has
>> died and the doctor tells me that the swelling will go down eventually.
>>
>> Rich Knowles
>> Indigo. LF38
>> Halifax
>>
>> On 2012-11-09, at 16:30, dwight veinot <dwightvei...@hfx.eastlink.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> How do you clean the lines leading from the tank(s) to the
>> faucets.doesn't
>> the same crud that accumulates on the tank walls also accumulate on the
>> inside walls of the plumbing hoses.
>>
>> I have not cleaned my tanks but I regularly add Javex to the water in
>> them
>> (note that we do not drink water from those tanks and would only do so in
> an
>> absolute emergency, like lost at sea or something, it is used for washing
>> dishes and showering but not for cooking or brushing teeth.  Even if I
>> had
>> washed the tanks I would still not be comfortable with consuming the
>> water
>> in them, too many uncertain sources used to refill.  I wonder why you
> remove
>> the wash solution from the tanks with a Shop Vac, instead of pumping the
>> wash solution through the plumbing lines and out through the faucets,
>> followed by a thorough rinse of the tank and the lines to the faucets
>> with
>> fresh water.
>>
>> I wonder how many people use water from the boats storage tanks as
>> potable
>> water versus carrying bottle water for drinking, cooking and brushing
>> teeth.
>>
>> Dwight Veinot
>> C&C 35 MKII, Alianna
>> Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
>> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Russ &
>> Melody
>> Sent: November 9, 2012 3:53 PM
>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>> Subject: Re: Stus-List water tanks.
>>
>>
>> For water tank cleaning I like a strong bleach solution, say 1/2 cup to
>> gallon of warm water (125mL -> 4 Litres).
>> pour solution into tank and swish/rub all surfaces with cloth or brush
>> let soak 5 - 10 minutes and repeat a number of times (while doing other
>> things)
>> remove bleach solution with shop vac
>> rinse with hose and remove water with shop vac
>> if over-wintering, I suggest leaving the tank ports open and cover
>> opening
>> with a cotton towel
>>          Cheers, Russ
>>         Sweet 35 mk-1
>>
>> At 10:53 AM 09/11/2012, you wrote:
>>
>>
>> What is the best way to clean them. I have access through hatches.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5384 - Release Date: 11/09/12
>> _______________________________________________
>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5384 - Release Date: 11/09/12
>> _______________________________________________
>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5384 - Release Date: 11/09/12
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>

--
Sent from my mobile device



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:56:25 -0400
From: Ken Heaton <kenhea...@gmail.com>
To: cnc-list <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Heaving-to
Message-ID:
        <CAAbfP6S=3p9s_-ha0y7mahgu72w6nph3gmq5yedkvh8ysjr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Mark,

I'm no expert but it would seem to me you need a fairly small head-sail to
get most any boat to heave to properly as the head-sail is normally
backwinded as part of heaving to.  Back-winding a sail much bigger than a
100% would put it hard on the spreaders which isn't going to be good for
the sail or for airflow around the sail.

Ciao.

Ken Heaton (& Anne Tobin)
S/V Salazar - Can 54955
C&C 37/40 XL - Hull # 67
Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia


On 10 November 2012 14:32, Mark G <mjg...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
> After 6 years of experimenting on an infrequent basis I was finally able
> to easily and repeatedly heave-to my 25 Mk1 this year.  I sail with a
> 135-140% Genoa on a furler.  On the day everything clicked it was furled to
> about 100-110%.  Since then, I have made furling the Genoa to 100-110% the
> first step of heaving-to.  It makes sense to me that, since heaving-to is
> all about balancing the sails, sail area forward would be a significant
> factor.  But on a boat without a furler this can't be accomplished without
> a sail change, etc.  So I'm thinking the same thing might be accomplished
> by positioning the main sail with the sheet or the traveler.  Can anybody
> weigh in on their experience, particularly with the 25 Mk1?
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/79ec67ce/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:12:17 -0500
From: Joe Della Barba <j...@dellabarba.com>
To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Stus-List Pelicans
Message-ID: <9710abe3-2bdf-4331-9529-71a905cc4...@dellabarba.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I  am on the way to rock hall and pelicans are going by begging for food from a 
crab boat.   Not sure why they are not in Florida for the winter.
Joe
Coquina
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/19cb7b9d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:17:27 -0400
From: Rich Knowles <r...@sailpower.ca>
To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Pelicans
Message-ID: <c507eb63-abc7-4dcb-8289-983a3edd7...@sailpower.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Maybe they had to stay home to vote?

Rich Knowles
Indigo. LF38
Halifax

On 2012-11-10, at 15:12, Joe Della Barba <j...@dellabarba.com> wrote:

I  am on the way to rock hall and pelicans are going by begging for food from a 
crab boat.   Not sure why they are not in Florida for the winter.
Joe
Coquina
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com

_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/951784f7/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:18:55 -0500
From: "Rick Brass" <rickbr...@earthlink.net>
To: <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List deck hatch leak
Message-ID: <027301cdbf78$3a75c5b0$af615110$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Mark;



The A&H hatch on my 38 has a different style of hold down than the hatch on my 
25 mk1. The 38 has knobs on the outside of the lens and handles inside to dog 
sown the hatch. The 25 has an arrangement with a threaded knob on a threaded 
shaft that tightens against a ?fork? that is cast into the inside of the frame. 
Sort of like the arrangement you find on an opening port on the side of the 
cabin.



My 25 is much like yours, no leaks but crazed and showing the effects of age. I 
don?t plan to touch it until it starts to leak.



My experience with the hatch on the 38 was that the hold down screws in the 
frame (12 I think) were ?? flat head sheet metal screws about 1 ?? to 2? long. 
They were screwed into a solid fiberglass frame in the deck layup ? no core. I 
would presume the 25 to be similar but have no proof of that. The screws came 
out with a large Phillips head screwdriver (#2?) and only moderate effort. 
There was butyl on the threads of the screws.



I removed the lens from the hatch frame I was refurbishing after removing the 
dogging hardware, and took it to a local glass shop. They used it as a pattern 
to make the new lens, drill the holes for the hold down screws, and machine out 
the recesses for the seals under the hatch dogs. Cost about $120 for the new 
lens.



Cautionary notes: 1) The new lens was ?? thick instead of 3/8? ? which seemed 
like a good idea. When they machined the recesses for the seals, the shop kept 
the same thickness under the seal as on the old lens, so the recess ended up 
1/8? deeper on the new lens and I ended up putting a couple of neoprene washers 
under the seals to bring them up flush with the top surface of the lens.  2) 
they seem to have drilled the screw holes before machining the recesses, and 
then turned the lens 180 degrees before machining the recesses. Guess what? The 
hole sapcing is slightly off between the front and the back of the hatch. I had 
to enlarge the holes slightly with my handy-dandy Dremmel tool. Make sure the 
glass shop matches the old lens exactly.



I bedded the new lens with Sikaflex 295UV and Sika primer. Just follow the 
directions on the packaging. Cost from Jamestown Distributors was around $160 
or so, IIRC.



The most time consuming part of the process was removing the old silicone that 
had been put into the hatch to try to seal the lens. Silicone will not stick to 
polycarbonate, and Sikaflex will not stick to silicone. I used a razor knife to 
scrape off most of the silicone, and then a silicone remover called 
Motsenbocker?s Lift Off Caulk and Silcone remover. Can?t recall where I bought 
it, but they have a website at www.liftoffinc.com . The process of cleaning the 
hatch took at least 6 hours ? silicone seems to be pretty tenacious stuff.



The refurbished hatch has been in place for about 10 months now, and no leaks 
yet (knock wood).



Hope this helps with your project.





Rick Brass

Imzadi -1976 C&C 38 mk1

la Belle Aurore -1975 C&C 25 mk1

Washington, NC







From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Mark G
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:11 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List deck hatch leak




Rick,

I may take on the same project on my '73 25 Mk1 next spring.  According to A&H 
what I have is the "old style" XR200, which is a 20" square hatch.  My existing 
hatch doesn't leak, not under the frame, not under the acrylic  But the acrylic 
is badly crazed and the latches (threaded knobs) are missing.  Replacement 
hardware is no longer available for this hatch, and I've had no luck at marine 
consignment shops after 5 years of looking.  I've jury-rigged some latches.  So 
I guess you could say this project is primarily to improve the appearance of 
the hatch.

I recently salvaged '74 25 Mk1 hull #301 and took the hatch among other things. 
 My experience was the same: screws came out easily, frame required some prying 
with a putty knife, sealant appeared to be butyl.  According to A&H this is the 
newer style XR200.  As you said below the different generations of A&H hatches 
don't use the same hardware, hinges or frame.  A&H even said there is a 1/8" or 
1/4" difference in the overall size.

The hatch from the salvage boat is complete with all the hardware, but the 
acrylic is badly crazed.  On this hatch, the acrylic is screwed to the frame in 
8 places.  I assume this is a previous acrylic replacement.  There is also 
evidence it leaked under the acrylic as a previous owner applied lots of 
additional sealant.

I've got quotes from Select Plastics and Hammerhead Nautical to refurb the 
salvage hatch, or should I say, to replace the acrylic.  Has anyone attempted 
to reanodize or paint the frame?

What was your experience reinstalling the frame?  On the salvage boat the frame 
screws came out easily.  I suspect they were screwed directly into a soggy 
balsa core.  If it's the same on my boat, I'm thinking I may have to do a core 
repair before I can reinstall the hatch.  (I replaced the chainplates last year 
and that turned into a significant core repair.)  Did you have to do a core 
repair?  Did you fill the existing holes and drill new ones?  Is thru-bolting 
an option?  I'm concerned I may not get enough compression on the seal without 
thru-bolts.

If it wasn't for the missing hardware, I'd keep the existing hatch and replace 
the acrylic - either on the boat or by just removing the top of the hatch at 
the hinge

Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Brass <rickbr...@earthlink.net>
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Sent: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:11:26 -0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Stus-List deck hatch leak




Imzadi had the original 27? square A&H hatch on the foredeck. I Had bought a 
used hatch some time ago, and planned to refurb that hatch and install it on 
the existing frame (which did not leak).



So my first question is why pull the frame if it isn?t leaking and you are 
planning to refurbish/reseal the lens in the hatch?



For me, it turned out that there are older and newer style A&H hatches and that 
the hinge arrangement is different enough that my refurbished hatch would not 
fit the existing frame. I took out all of the screws holding the hatch down and 
tried to lift the frame ? no joy. The hatch frame was bedded with gray butyl (I 
scraped a small sample from under the edge to determine what the sealant was), 
but boy was it tenacious. Finally forced a putty knife between the frame and 
deck in several places to break the seal, and used a wide pry  bar as a lever 
the frame off the deck.



My point is that the sealant could be butyl.



And, of course, the second point is that when you reinstall the frame DO NOT 
use 5200.





Rick Brass

Washington, NC



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/5210b8eb/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:22:22 -0600
From: "LKL Architects" <lklarchite...@gmail.com>
To: <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List deck hatch leak
Message-ID: <FEA85BDB21144ED8B8A33A43E6DB586E@LloydPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

LkL
Thanks for all the good responses.....I feel much better with going 
forward....will let the list know what happens....





Lloyd Lippe

Finesse

85 Landfall 39





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/a5e016a1/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:40:28 -0500
From: "Rick Brass" <rickbr...@earthlink.net>
To: <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Heaving-to
Message-ID: <02af01cdbf7b$3d1a5170$b74ef450$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I heave-to with Belle fairly frequently to socialize, eat lunch, sunbathe, etc. 
She has a 155 headsail most of the time, and occasionally in higher winds a 110 
lapper.



To heave-to on starboard tack I start on port and sheet in the genoa tight as I 
turn into the wind. Boom is close to the centerline of the boat. Once the boat 
stalls and the genoa is back winded, the boat will start to fall off to 
starboard. Tiller goes as far to port as possible and gets lashed off. Traveler 
is moved up or down until the boat stops and oscillation is acceptable. 
Generally the end of the boom is about 1 to 2 feet below the centerline of the 
boat. I adjust the mainsheet and vang, and the genoa cars, as needed to spill 
wind out of the top of the sails depending on how hard the wind is blowing.



In lighter winds the boat basically parks. I?ve done it a time or two in a 
brief squall, and the boat makes headway and leeway at around ? knot.



Practice in wind under 10 knots, it is pretty easy to do.





Rick Brass

Imzadi -1976 C&C 38 mk1

la Belle Aurore -1975 C&C 25 mk1

Washington, NC







From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Mark G
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:33 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List Heaving-to




After 6 years of experimenting on an infrequent basis I was finally able to 
easily and repeatedly heave-to my 25 Mk1 this year.  I sail with a 135-140% 
Genoa on a furler.  On the day everything clicked it was furled to about 
100-110%.  Since then, I have made furling the Genoa to 100-110% the first step 
of heaving-to.  It makes sense to me that, since heaving-to is all about 
balancing the sails, sail area forward would be a significant factor.  But on a 
boat without a furler this can't be accomplished without a sail change, etc.  
So I'm thinking the same thing might be accomplished by positioning the main 
sail with the sheet or the traveler.  Can anybody weigh in on their experience, 
particularly with the 25 Mk1?

Mark

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/bbd31c72/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:50:13 -0500
From: "Rick Brass" <rickbr...@earthlink.net>
To: <kenhea...@gmail.com>,      <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Heaving-to
Message-ID: <02b401cdbf7c$998c6fa0$cca54ee0$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The point is to not have any flow around the headsail, which in my
experience is always backwinded.



The backed headsail pushes the bow down until the main develops thrust and
moves the boat forward, then the rudder pushes the bow back up until the
boat stalls out and the backed headsail pushes the bow back down.



Now I do roll in the 140 on my 38 when I heave-to. I have a mark at 90% on
the foot of the sail mostly for that purpose. But that is because I have a
carbon fiber sail on a roller, and being up against the shrouds is not good
for the sail. I prefer to have chafe in the sheets than damage to the carbon
fibers.





Rick Brass

Washington, NC







From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Heaton
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:56 PM
To: cnc-list
Subject: Re: Stus-List Heaving-to



Hi Mark,



I'm no expert but it would seem to me you need a fairly small head-sail to
get most any boat to heave to properly as the head-sail is normally
backwinded as part of heaving to.  Back-winding a sail much bigger than a
100% would put it hard on the spreaders which isn't going to be good for the
sail or for airflow around the sail.



Ciao.



Ken Heaton (& Anne Tobin)
S/V Salazar - Can 54955
C&C 37/40 XL - Hull # 67
Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia



On 10 November 2012 14:32, Mark G <mjg...@comcast.net> wrote:


After 6 years of experimenting on an infrequent basis I was finally able to
easily and repeatedly heave-to my 25 Mk1 this year.  I sail with a 135-140%
Genoa on a furler.  On the day everything clicked it was furled to about
100-110%.  Since then, I have made furling the Genoa to 100-110% the first
step of heaving-to.  It makes sense to me that, since heaving-to is all
about balancing the sails, sail area forward would be a significant factor.
But on a boat without a furler this can't be accomplished without a sail
change, etc.  So I'm thinking the same thing might be accomplished by
positioning the main sail with the sheet or the traveler.  Can anybody weigh
in on their experience, particularly with the 25 Mk1?

Mark


_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/0da5bf50/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:59:51 -0500
From: Andrew Burton <a.burton.sai...@gmail.com>
To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Heaving-to
Message-ID: <99844f38-705e-4104-9efe-20e8e823a...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

My dad taught me how to heave to on our 1971 C&C 27. As Rick says, it's great 
for socializing in any amount of air.
We hove to for a couple of hours one year in fairly light airs halfway between 
Bermuda and St Martin so we could eat Thanksgiving dinner, on many other 
occasions, a reefed main or mizzen and a mostly furled jib have let us be 
comfortable in big breeze and huge seas. The main thing to remember other than 
what I've seen here is that how hard the main is sheeted determines your angle 
to the wind and seas. Ease it to let your bow fall off more; sheet in to point 
more into the breeze.
I usually heave to if we encounter strong head winds at sea, and I expect them 
to shift. There's no sense bashing up the boat and crew if the wind is going to 
shift or ease in a few hours or a day.

Andy


Andrew Burton
61 W Narragansett
Newport, RI
USA    02840

http://sites.google.com/site/andrewburtonyachtservices/
+401 965-5260

On Nov 10, 2012, at 2:40 PM, "Rick Brass" <rickbr...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> I heave-to with Belle fairly frequently to socialize, eat lunch, sunbathe, 
> etc. She has a 155 headsail most of the time, and occasionally in higher 
> winds a 110 lapper.
>
> To heave-to on starboard tack I start on port and sheet in the genoa tight as 
> I turn into the wind. Boom is close to the centerline of the boat. Once the 
> boat stalls and the genoa is back winded, the boat will start to fall off to 
> starboard. Tiller goes as far to port as possible and gets lashed off. 
> Traveler is moved up or down until the boat stops and oscillation is 
> acceptable. Generally the end of the boom is about 1 to 2 feet below the 
> centerline of the boat. I adjust the mainsheet and vang, and the genoa cars, 
> as needed to spill wind out of the top of the sails depending on how hard the 
> wind is blowing.
>
> In lighter winds the boat basically parks. I?ve done it a time or two in a 
> brief squall, and the boat makes headway and leeway at around ? knot.
>
> Practice in wind under 10 knots, it is pretty easy to do.
>
>
> Rick Brass
> Imzadi -1976 C&C 38 mk1
> la Belle Aurore -1975 C&C 25 mk1
> Washington, NC
>
>
>
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Mark G
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:33 PM
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Stus-List Heaving-to
>
>
> After 6 years of experimenting on an infrequent basis I was finally able to 
> easily and repeatedly heave-to my 25 Mk1 this year.  I sail with a 135-140% 
> Genoa on a furler.  On the day everything clicked it was furled to about 
> 100-110%.  Since then, I have made furling the Genoa to 100-110% the first 
> step of heaving-to.  It makes sense to me that, since heaving-to is all about 
> balancing the sails, sail area forward would be a significant factor.  But on 
> a boat without a furler this can't be accomplished without a sail change, 
> etc.  So I'm thinking the same thing might be accomplished by positioning the 
> main sail with the sheet or the traveler.  Can anybody weigh in on their 
> experience, particularly with the 25 Mk1?
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://cnc-list.com/pipermail/cnc-list_cnc-list.com/attachments/20121110/e913da3b/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
CnC-List mailing list
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com


------------------------------

End of CnC-List Digest, Vol 82, Issue 21
****************************************

_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to