Thanks - I'm in Centerport. The Sabre 's rating is all over the map these days. I'm seeing it upward of 120 in some regions for the WK version which is probably a more realistic number.
John Sent from my iPad On Apr 18, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Tim Goodyear <timg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Handicaps *should* show you the difference in performance. These are from > PHRF NE. You should be able to compare the 34+ and Sabre 386 from your > experience (apparently fairly similar). My experience sailing the 35-3 > (another Rob Ball design) is that windward performance is great; reaching and > downwind are weaker points (but not bad, mind you). Where in LIS are you > based? > > Tim > Mojito > C&C 35-3 > Branford, CT > > Boat > PHRF NE Base > C&C 37/40R > 63 > C&C 37/40XL > 66 > C&C 115 > 66 > C&C 37/40+ > 75 > C&C 34/36R > 81 > C&C 34/36XL > 84 > Sabre 386 > 84 > C&C 34/36 > 87 > Sabre 386 WK > 93 > C&C 38-3 > 102 > C&C 35-3 (my boat) > 114 > C&C 38-3 CB > 117 > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:33 PM, j...@svpaws.net <j...@svpaws.net> wrote: >> Any thoughts on the late 80's vintage 38? I'm thinking about one for a full >> restoration and ultimately to be used for coastal cruising (long island >> sound), casual phrf racing and limited offshore runs (Bermuda, BVI, etc). >> >> A little background. I currently sail a Sabre 386 but am uninspired by the >> performance. Build quality is great. I've owned 2 Rob Ball C &C's in the >> past, each for about 7 years - a 34+ and a 51xl. > _______________________________________________ > This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album > http://www.cncphotoalbum.com > CnC-List@cnc-list.com
_______________________________________________ This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album http://www.cncphotoalbum.com CnC-List@cnc-list.com
