Hi All, One thing to consider is the motion comfort - bigger heavier boats aren’t bounced around as much as beamy light ones. The best description of Ted Brewers Motion Comfort Number I’ve seen is at http://www.wavetrain.net/boats-a-gear/281-crunching-numbers-brewer-comfort-ratio
Course I’m biased, we are on a 35-II which is an anomy in even the C&C lineup, with a long narrow waterline. I was once delivering a Catalina 350, quartering 1-2’ wave slaps were bouncing & juddering the boat from the aft quarter, and I thought I must have snagged something, which was beating the hull up! Once I went dead down wind, lining up with the waves it was quiet and stable. Hope that helps, Lee On Sep 28, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Michael Brown via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: > The chart maps stiffness as heel from 1 pounds per square inch on the sails. > The three Landfalls, > LF 42 - LF 43 - LF 38, have a sail area / displacement rating of around 15. > The 30-1 is 18.4, and > the 41 is 19.35. The Landfalls are stiffer due to less sail area, the 41 due > to a deep keel. > > I have wondered if normalizing back to a common SA / Disp would be a more > useful comparison. > > Michael Brown > Windburn > C&C 30-1 > > > > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:12:55 -0500 > From: "Dennis C." <capt...@gmail.com> > To: CnClist <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > Subject: Re: Stus-List Recommendations Please... > Message-ID: > <CANir+yvfet+q_Gbc1RL3rrLQHHNaz0gGW6Wa=k22ezlggp-...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Isn't it wonderful to have a great resource like cncphotoalbum.com? The > diagram is under "Technical Info" then "Stability Diagram". The direct > link is: > > <http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/technical/stability.htm>. > > To be picky, it looks like the LF 42 is stiffer. Otherwise the 30 MK 1 > gets it. > > Also, since the site is a user supported resource, support can be given > at: > > <http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/chandlery_2/store.php?crn=226> > > Dennis C. > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Gary Nylander via CnC-List < > cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote: > > > Agreed. Somewhere in the archives there is a Dallenbach chart which shows > > the relative 'stiffness' of most of the early C&C's. It would be pretty > > useful in this selection. And the 30-1 is by itself. > > > > Gary > > 30-1 #593 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > > *To:* 'cnc-list@cnc-list.com' > > *Cc:* Della Barba, Joe <joe.della.ba...@ssa.gov> > > *Sent:* Monday, September 28, 2015 2:52 PM > > *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Recommendations Please... > > > > The 30 MK I is supposedly the stiffest boat C&C made. > > > > Joe > > > > Coquina > > > > C&C 35 MK I > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Email address: > CnC-List@cnc-list.com > To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom > of page at: > http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com >
_______________________________________________ Email address: CnC-List@cnc-list.com To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of page at: http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
