In the case of the 30-1, from the numbers I have heard of, I don’t think there were skips. I have #593, and it was built in late 1980. From the ones numbered in the high 200’s which were built in 1974, that gives them six years to build 300 boats – 50 a year. One per week? Does not seem to be out of line.
Gary St. Michaels Maryland From: cenelson via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 9:37 AM To: Stus-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> Cc: cenelson <cenel...@aol.com> Subject: Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers Has it been determined that C&C never skipped some hull numbers as different modifications to say a 30 Mk I were incorporated. In that case perhaps hull number 129 was followed by hull #200 which was the same ‘model’ but incorporated a new/improved something or other. Skipping numbers in a sequence is not unheard of in many industries. Charlie Nelson Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/us/app/aol-news-email-weather-video/id646100661> On Friday, October 8, 2021, 9:03 AM, dwight veinot via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > wrote: I think 351 C&C 35 MKI and MK II combined. Only 147 MKII’s and 204 MKl’s. And the marine carpenters did real nice teak work back in the mid 70’s and the hulls are thick solid polyester resin with glass fibre. No coring like balsa below the toe rail. Heavy and tough yet sleek looking and fast. No characteristic sword and dagger but unmistakable C&C quality. I love the shear lines of my MKII and the extensive teak carpentry below decks. However, Considering the work required nowadays and the type of sailing I enjoy, I think I would trade my 35MKII for a good 30 MKI with diesel auxiliary power. On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 8:53 AM Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > wrote: I have a 1973 C&C 35 Mk I, so in 73 they were not on MK IIs yet. I am hull number 179. The number of boats they built seems inconceivable today and they weren’t cheap, we paid more for our USED 35 than we did for our house! Joe Coquina From: dwight veinot via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 5:37 AM To: Stus-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > Cc: dwight veinot <dwight...@gmail.com <mailto:dwight...@gmail.com> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Stus-List Re: help with hull numbers I think you got it right. The C&C 30 MKI was a very popular design and my experience she is one helluva good boat. The company was turning out a lot of boats in 1974. My 35MK II hull 242 was also a 1974 model. I am not sure if there was a 1973 35MKII. Your 30 is one of the stiffest designs in the C&C line and slippery too. Good accommodations below as well. Congrats you got a good one. Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the costs involved. If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray Thanks - Stu -- Sent from Gmail Mobile Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the costs involved. If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray <https://www.paypal.me/stumurray%20> Thanks - Stu
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the costs involved. If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray Thanks - Stu
