Thanks Don,
For some reason the broker told me not to do that now as he has to do that
anyway when he sells the boat, however if doing this now will prove the
boat was built in the US it will save me some money on import fees when I
go to sell.

Thanks again,
Dan Cormier
C&C44 Breakaweigh
Halifax NS / GCS Florida


On Thu, Jul 7, 2022, 2:06 AM Donald Kern via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
wrote:

> Dan,
>
> Since your boat was once registered in the US as *Rainbow *with a USCG
> registration number of 1024202 on Dec 1994 and a HIN of ZCC44001H586 you
> could request an "Abstract of a Title" which should provide record of all
> the information submitted to the USCG including the chain of ownership and
> whether the boat was subject to the "Jones Act" ie; built in Canada.
>
> The USCG form (application fee $25.00 USD) can be found at:
>
>
> https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Our-Organization/Deputy-for-Operations-Policy-and-Capabilities-DCO-D/National-Vessel-Documentation-Center/
>
> Since the the USCG documentation expired Dec. 2001, it may take some time
> before you get an answer.
>
> When I received the "Abstract of a Title" for my boat, the very first line
> was "This vessel was built at ..."
> Don Kern
> *Fireball,* C&C35 Mk2
> Bristol, RI
>
>
>
> *Fireball*, C&C35 Mk-2
>
> On 7/6/2022 10:48 PM, Motion Designs Limited via CnC-List wrote:
>
> In February 1976, the initial models built at Rhode Island were the 24, 26
> and 29
>
> Page 30, The Pursuit of Excellence
>
> The Landfall 42 was project 76-1 so it wouldn’t be built till mid or late
> 76 with the Landfall 38 ( 78-13 ) being added in late 78 , early 79
>
> Now what I’ve wondered is how much the “Jones Act” influenced the decision
> to build Landfalls in the US, if they were going to used as commercial
> charter vessels or was it just closer to the intended market.  I’ve read
> somewhere that suggestion but I don’t know how valid that is
>
> JKC
>
> www.candcyachts.com
> Motion Designs Limited
> 647 990 7752
>
>
>

Reply via email to