Keith,

You are not overthinking this. You are correct that the coupler is a
designed interference fit. When I repowered our 38-2 I had a new coupler to
install, but getting it on the shaft was not possible with the tools I had.
You'd need a sledge hammer on the engine side and someone holding an anvil
against the prop. I opted to reuse the old coupler out of necessity. The
old one had a keyway and two 7/16" set screws. Not ideal but we now have
400 hours of motoring on it and have had no issues. I actually tried to
take it off last winter to check the packing material and it was so tight I
would've needed to remove the engine and use a puller to get it off. If
you're really worried about it, drill out your small set screws and tap
larger ones. You can put a lot clamping force on a 7/16" set screw.

 Cheers,

Riley

On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, 9:22 PM CHARLES SCHEAFFER via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Gotta do the same project.
>
> I think you are over thinking this.  The OD of the hose is irrelevant.
> The OD of the cutless bearing needs to be measured as struts can vary
> between models and years.  Best to get the cutless bearing that fits the
> strut, and that may need to be measured to get that right.
>
> I look forward to the replies.
>
> Chuck S
>
>
>
> On 02/03/2024 8:51 PM EST keith morgenstern via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hey folks, I'm hoping the C&C community will help me out.
>
> Two shaft line questions, one perhaps easy, one perhaps hard.
>
> Easy Question: On the 35 mk3, does anyone recall the dimensions on the
> cutlass bearing? Obviously the ID (shaft size) is 1.0-inches. I think the
> length is 4", but what is the OD??
>
> Hard Question: I need to replace the old and tired rubber hose between the
> shaft log and the packing gland. To do this, one obviously needs to remove
> the coupling from the transmission end of the shaft. The problem (i've
> heard) is that the coupling is slightly undersized to the shaft so that it
> has a nice tight interference fit. So not only is removal really hard, but
> once you get it off, and clean all the rust off...it's no longer a very
> good interference fit. So when you put it back together, the only thing
> transmitting the torque is the shaft key and the tiny set screws, rather
> than the nice "hug" of an interference fit.
> Q1: is this a real thing?
> Q2: has anyone ever done this and had no problems?
>
> Thanks a bunch!!
>
> -Keith M
> Please show your appreciation for this list and the Photo Album site and
> help me pay the associated bills. Make a contribution at:
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> Thanks for your help.
> Stu
>
> Please show your appreciation for this list and the Photo Album site and
> help me pay the associated bills.  Make a contribution at:
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
> Thanks for your help.
> Stu
Please show your appreciation for this list and the Photo Album site and help 
me pay the associated bills.  Make a contribution at:
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
Thanks for your help.
Stu

Reply via email to