On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote: >> Never happens on Linux, and isn't (forced) to be happening here. > > Windows is not linux, it has its constraints (and advantages) that > force developers to actually do the builds as well. Whether these > binaries will be packaged or distributed by them or 3rd party (some > CoApp structure for example) is an open question at this stage.
Why can't building be done by a third party? > However, I'm trying to get a clear idea about the goals of CoApp from > a packaging and distribution point of view. That alone will need a > huge amount of discussions, tests, compromises, etc. before it gets > adopted by the projects (read: > 1 year). Everything else is rather a > low priority to my eyes, especially the developer things like build > tools, configuration helpers or unix/bsd layers, where solutions exist > already. My worry is to see CoApp focuses too much on the latter > rather than on the packages/distros part. Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
