On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Elizabeth M Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > As we discussed during the summit and is mentioned on the wiki:
Ah, found it. > Few dependencies > Fast > Small > Binding facilities for most high level languages are common > > The ability to tie a C library into anything and everything is the biggest > reason to use C over C++, using and binding to C++ libraries (especially in > most languages - they tend to be written in C) is a real headache - actually > beyond a headache, most times it's just a recipe for failure. C++ can do C bindings as well, can't it? Our bindings should certainly be C. Doesn't C++ share the other advantages? Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
