On 18 May 2010 11:07, Olaf van der Spek <[email protected]> wrote: > Obviously our API and ABI will be C. This doesn't mean the > implementation has to be C as well, right?
It doesn't *have* to be, but it makes life much easier if it is. Any other choice would see us fighting with the language to achieve our goals (small, fast, easy to bind, has no dependencies not satisfied by Windows itself). Ease of binding and no dependencies make C an obvious choice, as has already been discussed. Regards, Phil _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
