If you have worked extensively with "traditional" Linux-based servers
and compare the internals of same with the RAQ (my issue is the RAQ3
specifically), what you see is not pretty.  The RAQ has a GUI that,
while helpful to those unfamiliar with Linux, Apache, Sendmail, etc.
administration, precludes (and, in fact erases) file edits that are
consistent with and an integral part of the aforementioned packages
provided by the developers to implement some worthwhile features.  More
distressing, you see in the RAQ a collection of woefully outdated
software, some two years old yet under active development and
improvement by the open source community.  Sun makes packages available
only after it can tweak them to not interfere with the GUI.  Fair
enough.  But what about those who want to run a "real" Linux that is
free of the GUI and its restrictions?  Ignoring the issue of "breaking"
the warranty, what are the items that have to be addressed?  In other
words, what (from a hardware/OS internal viewpoint) makes a RAQ a RAQ?

>From my vantage point, I see three basic things.  First the RAQ has an
LCD display panel.  Second, the RAQ has no intrinsic video capability.
Third, the RAQ has a web-based control panel that is the primary means
of administering the system.  Web-based administration is important to
me since my RAQ3 is a) leased [I've never even seen it] and b) a hundred
miles away from my office.  Using a combination of other (IMHO better,
at least for my needs) web-based control panels, some custom scripts we
have developed (for other systems but applicable to RedHat Linux more or
less generally), and SSH, we do what we will without using the Cobalt
GUI.
There may be other important things (one-of-a-kind disk and/or network
controllers), but these are not quite so obvious.

If, in fact, we need to go so far as to make far-reaching changes that
disable the GUI, what are the implications?  Is any of this documented
anywhere?  For example, are drivers for the LCD panel available so we
can provide on-site observers with the kind of visual feedback they are
accustomed to seeing during boots?  If so, where are they?  If not, what
happens to the LCD panel if it is not actively controlled?  Is there
other unique hardware that is not supported by Linux (specifically
RedHat 7.x) out of the box?  If so, are drivers available?  If so, where
are they?
 
I recognize that the concept of the web server as an appliance is
desirable to some people; I am not one of them.  And, yes, I know I
would be better served by a Dell server, but that is not an option at
this point.  The RAQ represents a value for me from a lease cost
viewpoint, but an inconvenience from a leading-edge development
viewpoint.  I'd like to accentuate the positive while eliminating the
negative, but the lack of information of the type I have mentioned makes
this difficult and is quite foreign to the open-source character of the
Linux community which is, after all, the cornerstone of its success.

I would appreciate replies from anyone who has specific information on
these issues, including (perhaps most notably) Sun people.

Jack

_______________________________________________
cobalt-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers

Reply via email to