I for one believe in moving forward, not staying the same. There is a different in the Cobalt Raq3 and 4 compared to this software. To upgrade to a new Cobalt Raq 4 you would have to shell out more money.
The Webalizer software on the other hand is FREE! Why not use the new version? Taco, don't get me wrong here, I think you do awsome work and I appreciate it very much. AKA Joe! > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Michael Hooper > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:26 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [cobalt-developers] New webalizer pkg on > pkg.nl.cobalt.com > > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > Why not just put the Webalizer 2.01 there? Why waste time > with this > > older > version? There is already a 2.01 version at > > http://cobalt-aid.sourceforge.net/files/ > > 1. Because if you install 2.01 you will loose all prior stats > of that month 2. Because the version on cobalt-aid is not > based on rpms 3. Because people had a broken 1.3, I fixed the 1.3 > > How would you react if Cobalt said 'there is a bug in the raq > 3, we are not going to fix it, you'll have to buy a raq 4' ? > > We will hopefully release a pkg version of the 2.01 version > soon as well. It is however impossible upgrade without losing > stats for the running month. Therefore you'd best install > 2.01 on the first of any month. > > With regards, > > Taco Scargo > > I see your point Taco, however I am one who has V2.01 and my > stats stopped. So, apparently it wasn't just 1.3 that was > flawed. I look forward to seeing the new version patched soon. > > Thanks for everything. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > cobalt-developers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt> -developers > _______________________________________________ cobalt-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
