Tim Hockin wrote: > I'm curious as to why those are "more serious" that Linux/x86. Please > enlighten me.
My response would be a close rewrite of one of the arguments freeBSD proponents use against the adoption of Linux: Sun Solaris has one entity driving the codebase and the releases, and therefore it's much easier to develop for (no worry about different releases from different vendors being completely different. Another good argument for a developer would be the requirement that if you use any of the free code from Linux in your code you're required to release the source code to your product. Fortunately, I'm NOT a developer <smile>. If you want a better answer, more specific to Sun Solaris, then call some of your Sun coworkers <smile again>. Jeff -- Jeff Lasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting nobaloney.net P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484 _______________________________________________ cobalt-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
