this has been discussed before and IIRC the theory is that the scripts deal w/ whatever you name the interface when you add it to the system. If you add an interface named 'em1' it would configure and interface 'em1', just like for 'eth0'.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Zack Perry <zack.pe...@sbcglobal.net>wrote: > I finally got around to test cobbler 2.4.0 from epel-testing to PXE boot > Fedora 17. After the past few days struggles with Ubuntu, doing RH > alike systems is like having a break :-) > > Nevertheless, I noticed that the system came up with em1. This is not > news to me, and I know how to deal with it. But the Q is, up to now, > the snippets bundled with cobbler 2.4.0 still assumes that the first > network interface is named as eth0. What is the current plan in dealing > this device name change (which I know quite a few people are not happy' > with)? > > Regards, > > --Zack > _______________________________________________ > cobbler mailing list > cobbler@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler >
_______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list cobbler@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
