John,

You bring up an interesting topic that hasn't been formally presented to the 
Colorado Bird Records Committee (CBRC) with respect to a submitted report that 
I'm aware of.  The CBRC's bylaws state under Section VIII, C(10) that:

"A first state record is established by the acceptance of a record with at 
least two observers submitting reports, one observer photograph or audio record 
where the photographic or audio-recorded evidence support the identification, 
or a specimen record. A single-observer 'accepted' sight record cannot at that 
time be accepted as a new state record. However, if such a record is considered 
'accepted' other than the fact that it is a first state record by a single 
observer, it shall be given a status of 'provisionally accepted.' It shall 
retroactively be considered the first state record upon the acceptance of a 
subsequent record of that species meeting the above requirements for a first 
state record."

So, where does a remotely sensed bird fall into that paragraph?  I don't know.  
The requirement for a first state record is either 1) physical evidence, or 2) 
multiple observers submitting separate reports.  Does a transmitter signal 
constitute physical evidence, much in the way that an audio recording would?  
Does the receiver constitute a single observer (note tongue-in-cheek)?  There 
are certainly records for heard-only birds.  One could argue that satellite 
telemetry is just an "extension" of our ability to know the location of a 
previously identified bird.

First state records are based on unequivocal information regarding species 
identification and location.  I would support submitting a remotely sensed 
report of a potential first state record to the CBRC to review that 1) provided 
physical evidence (e.g., photo) that the bird was correctly identified in the 
first place, and 2) summarized the technology involved, including location 
accuracy specific to Colorado and associated bias/error rates.  With that 
information, at least, the CBRC would be able to debate its status, including 
being considered a "single-observer record" and therefore at best only 
"provisionally accepted."

Good birding (physically and remotely),

Doug Faulkner
CBRC Chair



 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to cobirds+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cobirds@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to