Julia Lawall wrote: > There is no short term solution for the semantic patch as written. But it > is possible to reorganize the semantic patch in this case to make it work. > The transformation needs to be just on the specific declared variable, and > not on the complete declaration statement: > > @@ > identifier x; > type T; > @@ > > T x > - = x > ;
Neat trick. I just remembered another feature request: would it be difficult for spatch to write a relevant filename and line number with its error messages? (In this example, I made do by repeatedly bisecting the set of files passed on the command line.) Thanks for the quick and thorough response. _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
