On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 18:45, SF Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote: >> But as I mentioned in another mail, EBNF is just NOT the way to go in >> order to get people to begin to use Coccinelle on a larger scale -- >> people who read and _write_ C are orders of magnitude more numerous >> than people who can read EBNF - let alone write it. > > Would you like to include any syntax diagrams in your documentation > approach? > > http://www-cgi.uni-regensburg.de/~brf09510/syntax.html > http://karmin.ch/ebnf/index > http://dotnet.jku.at/applications/Visualizer/ > http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~thiemann/haskell/ebnf2ps/ > > Regards, > Markus >
Very useful indeed. I'll try and make one of these tools work on the existing grammar specification... -- Francis Galiegue, [email protected] "It seems obvious [...] that at least some 'business intelligence' tools invest so much intelligence on the business side that they have nothing left for generating SQL queries" (Stéphane Faroult, in "The Art of SQL", ISBN 0-596-00894-5) _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
