I need to see your semantic patch, perhaps pattern1.cocci?
Yes ...
See also:
http://lists.diku.dk/pipermail/cocci/2011-December/002305.html
Slightly adjusted variant:
@r@
identifier f;
@@
f(...)
{
...
}
@is_void@
identifier r.f;
@@
void f(...)
{
...
}
@depends on !is_void@
identifier r.f;
identifier g;
@@
g(...)
{<+...
* f(...);
...+>}
Does the command "spatch" need any more include parameters in this approach to
find also ignored return values from functions that belong to the standard C
library?
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
