On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
In the near future, you will be able to use the name of a rule as a
metavariable
that matches the whole thing that that rule matched.
I am interested to hear/read a bit more about this planned extension.
I have got the impression that the type of a SmPL metavariable corresponds to
a syntactic element from a source programming language like C directly. I
assume that further reuse of SmPL rule names does not need to change this
mapping. Is a new SmPL key word needed for improved features?
There are no new keywords. You just use the rule name as a metavariable
as shown in the example.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
