> 2. I do not need an empty ";" ... Should I create a second rule > which removes extra ";" ? Or there is a better way?
In your rule, you wrote: > - retlen = 0 (without the semicolon) So, that's why you end up with an empty statement. I guess that if you turn it into a statement by adding the semicolon, then maybe also your question 1 disappears? > 3. Why "mtdchar_read3()" does not match? That probably has to do with the fact that there is an execution path in that function that does not include mtd_read() call (your 'case 2'). You probably have to use one of the special '...', like '... when any' or '.. when exists', but I'd have to lookup which one was which again. Arie > > Thanks for help! > > -- > Best Regards, > Artem Bityutskiy > > _______________________________________________ > Cocci mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci > (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only) _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
