On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Can any open issues with the construct "<+... ...+>" be improved?
You would have to explain what you would expect it to do.
Otherwise "consistently" is meaningless.
Is a further clarification for the functionality difference in this filter
variant needed?
http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/docs/main_grammar008.html#NEST
You are pointing to the grammar, not a discussion of functionality.
Please explain what you expect <+... ...+> to do in the case of
structures. Otherwise there is no way to judge whether the functionality
you expect is the same or different from a functionality that is already
provided.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
