On Sun, 9 Mar 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > I have no idea. I would have sort of expected that it would return a > > length of 2, but I guess it is reasonable, and even desirable, that it > > does not. What answer would you like? > > I would expect that it will be treated by the SmPL pattern as a function with > a > single named parameter at least. I am unsure how the "ellipsis" should be > counted and matched in the signature eventually. > > Does this small source file indicate that there might be further difficulties > for data analysis of variadic functions?
Without knowing what you mean by "data analysis" it is impossible to tell. It is clear that there is some problem with ... matching a parameter-typed metavariable. This could be considered reasonable, because ... is not a (single) parameter. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
