> It should be much better for the understandability of your code,
> for the maintainability of your code, and for the speed of processing
> your code to say
>
> identifier allocation = {function1, function2, function3, function4, ...};
Function names from various application programming interfaces follow
a few naming patterns.
Can SmPL scripts benefit from the fact that such identifiers contain
a couple of identical name components?
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
