On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Oct 05 2016, SF Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 2. ..and how would I go about if instead of the type, I want to replace
> >> a variable name? (my_type *ptr --> my_type *pointer).
> >
> > Would you like to try another small SmPL script out like the following?
> >
> >
> > @name_replacement@
> > @@
> > my_type *
> > -ptr
> > +pointer
> > ;
>
> I could try it, but I'm actually more interested in understanding how
> this works (I already solved my primariy problem). Could you explain
> this script a bit more? What exactly does "@name_replacement@" mean?
Between the initial @@ you can put the name of the rule, as well as some
other information. If no other rule needs to refer to this one, then
there is no need for a name.
julia
> Does it the interpretation of "my_type *" further down?
>
>
> > How will your software development experiments evolve for the desired
> > application of the semantic patch language?
>
> Aeh, sorry, I don't understand the question.
>
>
> Best,
> -Nikolaus
>
> --
> GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
> Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
>
> »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
> _______________________________________________
> Cocci mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
