Dear Elena, Would you like to take another look at my development suggestion for your approach? https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2017-August/004300.html
How do you think about to refactor another rule like the following? @r3 exists@ expression E; identifier I=~"^atomic(?:64|_long)?_add_return$"; position P; @@ E = I@P(-1, ...); Can the specification of SmPL constraints be occasionally be more succinct with the use of regular expressions? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
