It seems that the last rule would be better as: @@ expression list[r.n] r.es; constant char[] r.c; identifier s.c2; @@
NV_PRINTF(es, - c + c2 ,...) It seems that when you remove and add back a comma, it thinks you really want a comma to be there, and there is none if the string is the last argument. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
