On 2/16/19 7:33 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> There's a qualifier propagation issue left in the case the field is an array.
>> I have attached a patch that extends the tests/qualifier.c test case
>> to demonstrate the problem.
>
> Can the desired functionality check be performed also with a bit less
> source code by using the conditional operator?
Sure it can. Would it be better? No.
Exercise left to the interested reader why I consider my variant to be
better.
>
> - return (int *)&b->i;
> + return b->i ? (int *)&b->i : (int *)&b->j[0];
>
>
> Will both test approaches be eventually needed?
bye
michael
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
