Hello,

I have noticed another questionable software behaviour during the application
of the semantic patch language.

elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Linux/next-patched> time spatch --timeout 34 -j 2 
--chunksize 1 -D database_URL=postgresql+psycopg2:///parallel_DVB_duplicates 
--dir drivers/media/dvb-frontends --sp-file 
~/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor/list_duplicate_statement_pairs_from_if_branches4.cocci
 > 
~/Projekte/Bau/Linux/scripts/Coccinelle/duplicates1/next/20190418/pair-DVB-results.txt
 2> 
~/Projekte/Bau/Linux/scripts/Coccinelle/duplicates1/next/20190418/pair-DVB-errors.txt

real    5m56,708s
user    11m4,775s
sys     0m0,688s


I know from my previous update suggestion “[media] Use common error handling 
code
in 19 functions” that change possibilities can be found.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/9/823
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/57ef3a56-2578-1d5f-1268-348b49b0c...@users.sourceforge.net/


But the generated log file contains the information “No result for this 
analysis!”.
I wonder then why desired data were not stored in the corresponding database 
table
by such a SmPL script variant.

Is there still a need to perform parallelisation for the mentioned software
components by other approaches?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to