On Wed, 15 May 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> A return statement was specified with a known value for three branches > >> of a SmPL disjunction. > >> Reduce duplicate SmPL code there by using another disjunction for > >> these return values. > … > > NACK. The goak is not to squeeze the most information into the fewest > > number of characters. > > Can you accept any other formatting for the adjusted SmPL code? No. It's fine as is. > > > > The rule was fine as it was. > > Can different run time characteristics become relevant here? No. julia
