> The when any's allow any possible match. I agree to this technical aspect.
> There are three calls to foo so three possible matches. I find that this possibility does not require to repeat the evaluation for the complete OCaml script rule. I would find a possible repetition eventually reasonable for the SmPL code between the ellipses. But I would interpret the code “\(foo@c3();\&S@c4\)” in the way that it should match only one function call with the expected comment combination in this test finally. >> How is the situation treated that a comment is between two executable >> statements? > > What is between two statements is after the first one There is an usual before-after relationship. > sad before the second one. ??? > Any comments will be in the after list of the first > and the before list of the second. Does this feedback mean that such a comment should identically appear in two lists from different attributes? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
