> but not: > > @@ > @@ > > - #ifdef FOO > bar(); > - #endif
The deletion of these preprocessor statements is not directly supported in the shown way by the Coccinelle software at the moment. But I got another code transformation idea which would not be so convenient. The semantic patch language supports the metavariable type “statement list” for a while. https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/cad4c0705f9e37f501531e133d3a47bc56ed0ce2/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L209 I imagine then that the function call can be “intentionally” deleted and added back in such a simple SmPL script example. * Should any extra C code vanish after such a special adjustment because specific parts were not restored? * Can it make sense here to change a bit of code even if it was originally intended to keep it untouched? Will similar software updates become more challenging for the initially described handling of designated initialisers for known data structures? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
