On 01.07.19 10:10, Markus Elfring wrote: Hi folks,
> +@script:python to_do depends on org@ > +p << or.p; > +@@ > +coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0], > + "WARNING: An error message is probably not needed > here because the devm_ioremap_resource() function contains appropriate error > reporting.") > + > +@script:python reporting depends on report@ > +p << or.p; > +@@ > +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], > + "WARNING: An error message is probably not > needed here because the devm_ioremap_resource() function contains appropriate > error reporting.") > -- By the way: do we have any mechanism for explicitly suppressing individual warnings (some kind of annotation), when the maintainer is sure that some particular case is a false-positive ? (I'm thinking of something similar to certain #praga directives for explicitly ignoring invididual warnings in specific lines of code) I believe such a feature, so we don't get spammed with the same false positives again and again. --mtx -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult Free software and Linux embedded engineering i...@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287
