> *Allow defining the environment variable “COCCI” as a directory to > search SmPL scripts. > > *Start a corresponding file determination if it contains an acceptable > path. > > *Update coccinelle.rst documents for use coccicheck with a directory > selection
‣ Do you really insist to use an enumeration without alignment in your change description? ‣ Can the following third item be nicer? * Adjust software documentation for using coccicheck with a selected directory. > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ Two other modes provide some common combinations of these > modes. … > +Using Coccinelle with defalut value Why did you repeat a typo? How do you think about to use the section title “Using Coccinelle with the default configuration”? … > +semantic patch. In that case, the variable must be initialized with > +the name of the semantic patch to apply. I prefer an other wording. …, it should be set to the file name of the semantic patch to apply. … > +directory. In that case, the variable must be initialized with the name of …, it should be set to the … Will the presented case distinction need another adjustment for the document outline? … > Controlling Which Files are Processed by Coccinelle … Did you overlook another update candidate (which I tried to point out before)? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?id=a99d8080aaf358d5d23581244e5da23b35e340b9#n189 “… COCCI variable may additionally be used to only apply a single semantic patch as shown in the previous section. …” Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci