> Coccinelle could provide an appropriate running time by just ignoring the > <+... ...+>. But that seems like a pointless optimization, when the user > could just not put the <+... ...+> in the first place.
I would like to express a specific SmPL functionality. > Coccinelle already applies a rule everywhere that it occurs, This aspect is clear to some degree. > regardless of whether the two occurrences are in the same function. Our views can be different also for the discussed use case. * How much will the requirement for changing selected items multiple times matter? * Are we eventually looking for another clarification also in the software documentation? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
