On 28/02/2020 09:45, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
>
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> It seems that PyGTKCompat is not in Debian, so IMHO I would not consider
>> that option.
>>
>> The files with pygtk are:
>>
>> docs/manual/cocci-python.txt:The latter depends on pygtk2, and the
>> dependency will not be evaluated until runtime.
>> python/coccilib/coccigui/coccigui.py:import pygtk
>> python/coccilib/coccigui/coccigui.py:pygtk.require("2.0")
>> python/coccilib/coccigui/pycoccimodel.py:import pygtk
>>
>> So according with Julia, removing that files will not affect to coccinelle.
> The files are gone in github. We expect to make a new release within
> about a week.
>
> juliaoh great! thanks! Emmanuel > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:04 AM Julia Lawall <julia.law...@inria.fr> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Nicolas Palix wrote: >> >> > Le 27/02/2020 à 10:45, Julia Lawall a écrit : >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Nicolas Palix wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Emmanuel, >> > > > >> > > > Instead of porting to GObject directly, >> > > > can we use PyGTKCompat ? >> > > > >> > > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/PyGObject/PyGTKCompat >> > > >> > > The problem is resolved by removing the python file that >> relied on the >> > > unavailable library. I don't think that that python file is >> useful. >> > >> > It looks like python/coccilib/coccigui contains the offending >> files: >> > coccigui.py, pygui.glade and pygui.gradep. >> > But according to vimcom.py and vimembed.py, these laters also >> depend of GTK. >> > >> > Should the coccigui folder be entirely removed ? >> >> Yes, they have already been removed on github. >> >> julia >> >> >> > >> > > >> > > julia >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > >> > > > Le 04/02/2020 à 16:25, eamanu a écrit : >> > > > > Hi! >> > > > > >> > > > > On 04/02/2020 11:59, Julia Lawall wrote: >> > > > > > On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, eamanu wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi everybody, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Sorry if this issues is duplicated, I am new in the >> mailing list >> > > > > > > and in a very quickly searching I didn't found about >> this issue. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I am working on Coccinelle package on Debian >> > > > > > Thanks! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > and currently >> > > > > > > exist the next bug [1]. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > There is any plan to port to use GObject >> Instrospection? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [1] >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885267 >> > > > > > I think we should just drop the code that depends on >> it. It was added >> > > > > > for >> > > > > > a MS thesis more than 10 years ago, and I don't think >> anyone has used >> > > > > > it >> > > > > > since. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I will look into it. >> > > > > >> > > > > Great, if you need help, I can help :-) >> > > > > >> > > > > I will wait for any news. Thanks >> > > > > >> > > > > eamanu >> > > > > > >> > > > > > julia >> > > > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > Cocci mailing list >> > > > > Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr >> > > > > https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Nicolas Palix >> > > > http://lig-membres.imag.fr/palix/ >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Nicolas Palix >> > http://lig-membres.imag.fr/palix/ >> > >> >> > > -- Emmanuel Arias @eamanu yaerobi.com
0xFA9DEC5DE11C63F1.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
