>> @display@ >> expression e; >> @@ >> *brelse(e); >> <+... when != e = ... >> (e = ... >> | >> *e >> )...+> >> >> >> I would find it nicer if I do not need to repeat a code exclusion >> specification >> as the first element of a SmPL disjunction for this special use case. > > You don't. The when you have is useless.
I am curious under which circumstances we will achieve a better common understanding for the shown application of SmPL disjunctions eventually together with additional code exclusion specifications. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
