I propose once more to avoid a typo in the previous patch subject.
… > ( > - size = E1 * E2; > + size = array_size(E1, E2); > | > - size = E1 * E2 * E3; > + size = array3_size(E1, E2, E3); > | > - size = E1 * E2 + E3; > + size = struct_size(E1, E2, E3); > ) How do you think about to use SmPL disjunctions like the following? size = ( - (E1) * (E2) + array_size(E1, E2) | - (E1) * (E2) * (E3) + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) | - (E1) * (E2) + (E3) + struct_size(E1, E2, E3) ); > ... when != size = E4 > when != size += E4 … Can it become helpful to express a constraint for a metavariable of the type “assignment operator”? > ( > * size = E1 * E2;@p > | > * size = E1 * E2 * E3;@p > | > * size = E1 * E2 + E3;@p > ) *size =@p \( (E1) * (E2) \| (E1) * (E2) * (E3) \| (E1) * (E2) + (E3) \) Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
