On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > > +(
> > > > +for_each_node_by_name(n,e1) S
> > > > +|
> > > …
> > > > +|
> > > > +for_each_node_with_property(n,e1) S
> > > > +)
> > > …
> > >
> > > I propose to reconsider the coding style for this SmPL disjunction once
> > > more.
> > >
> > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:45:25 +0200
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/5a74b3c5-c0e9-1426-c477-72bb86bcf...@web.de/
> >
> > It's quite fine as is.
>
> Would you care a bit more for the clarification of the ordering for the shown
> macro names?
Why does the ordering matter, since they are all distinct?
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
