On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Ben Lachman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can in fact persistently store files without managing them as a > really nifty easy to use, well performing, bindings enabled, undo- > able object graph. Its called a filesystem. But most of us don't > think they're so nifty anymore*.
"File" is a superset of "persistent object store". You can't meaningfully store an object without storing an object graph (and if it's one object, it's a trivial graph). Bindings, etc. are not specific to Core Data, but of course are wonderfully integrated. Though the one thing I didn't think of is data modeling, especially relationships. That's definitely one thing about Core Data that does not depend on persistence, and I hereby concede that Core Data is not entirely about persistence. --Kyle Sluder _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
