On Jul 13, 2015, at 16:55 , Charles Srstka <cocoa...@charlessoft.com> wrote:
>
> What’s the intended use of that, to force an instance to use a superclass’s
> implementation of some method instead of the overridden version? If so, that
> seems really open to abuse…
I dunno, personally. But it was discussed in the old Swift forum. For example:
https://devforums.apple.com/message/1128450#1128450
<https://devforums.apple.com/message/1128450#1128450>
A type-safe target-action pattern seems to be the winning use case.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
