> On Oct 1, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Gerriet M. Denkmann <gerr...@mdenkmann.de> wrote: > > I inherited some code with: > > @interface BaseThing : NSObject <NSCopying> > > @property (nonatomic) SomeDataClass *stuff; > > @end > > > @interface SubThing : BaseThing > > @property (nonatomic) SubDataClass* stuff; // SubDataClass is a > subclass of SomeDataClass > > @end > > > @implementation SubThing > > // nothing about stuff here > > @end > > > Xcode 7.0 tells me: > warning: auto property synthesis will not synthesize property ‘stuff’; it > will be implemented by its superclass, use @dynamic to acknowledge intention. > > I don’t think that I want ’stuff’ to be implemented by its superclass. Rather > I want it to be overridden. So I am not sure, whether @dynamic is the right > thing to do. > > How to make the compiler happy?
Two options: 1) Implement -stuff and -setStuff: in your @implementation. If you do this, you don’t even need to declare stuff in the @interface. 2) Keep the declaration in the @interface, and stick “@synthesize stuff;” in the @implementation. Charles _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
