On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Charles Srstka
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Wait, what? Okay, that contradicts the understanding that I had come to...
> so the built-in views establish two-way bindings *without* overriding
> bind:toObject:withKeyPath:options:? Great, that puts us back to square one!

It would seem so, but in fact I was mistaken about the equivalence
between "value" and "objectValue" bindings: the binding to objectValue
is only a one-way binding. I guess that difference would make it safer
to use a separate namespace.

Hamish
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to