On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Charles Srstka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait, what? Okay, that contradicts the understanding that I had come to... > so the built-in views establish two-way bindings *without* overriding > bind:toObject:withKeyPath:options:? Great, that puts us back to square one! It would seem so, but in fact I was mistaken about the equivalence between "value" and "objectValue" bindings: the binding to objectValue is only a one-way binding. I guess that difference would make it safer to use a separate namespace. Hamish _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]