On 22 Jul '08, at 4:55 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:

Does it not make sense for you to rely on Finder's built-in WebDAV
support?  Because if you can get away with it, it's great... I'm
having visions of Dreamweaver's go-it-alone attitude towards WebDAV
and how much happier I was when I could stop dealing with it by just
mounting my share in Finder.

It depends on what the OP wants to do. WebDAV isn't a file server protocol, even though it often gets (mis)used as one, and there are a lot of uses for it that don't involve accessing a filesystem. CalDAV is one example, and there are also schema for using WebDAV to access email on a server (I think Yahoo! mail supports this.)


em wrote:
Absoutely not--that wouldn't make sense if I was looking for an
objective-c framework.  And by the way, do you always answer  a
question with another question?  Isn't that bizarre?


Since you're not the original poster (nor have you contributed to this thread earlier) I don't see why you feel entitled to jump in with a decision that Kyle's answer is inappropriate for William's question. Your response also shows that you don't understand what Kyle is getting at: in some cases people do use WebDAV merely for accessing files on a server, in which case using the Finder would be a good alternative.

Answering with a question is entirely appropriate, as it politely indicates that your answer isn't definitive, but is providing more information for the original poster to come to his/her own conclusion with.

—Jens

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to