On 7/7/09 1:19 AM, Mike Abdullah said: >> Thanks all for your feedback. Seems quite inefficient. Wonder if this >> is filed as a suggestion to Apple. > >Why should that matter? File a request anyway, it will make the >existing request ore prominent.
Not that I disagree with the "file a request anyway" attitude, but since you asked a question... :) One reason it could matter is because time is finite. With limited time, one might want to prioritize filing non-dupes. >Finally, the whole validation issue is an important one. An object can >refuse to be deleted because certain criteria are not satisfied. In >your proposed -deleteObjects: API, how would it deal with some objects >agreeing to be deleted, but others not? The same way deleteObject: does, by returning void. :) -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng s...@rogue-research.com Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
