Hi Quincey > Well, I'm probably missing your point, but why wouldn't you get the Core Data > object directly and leave the NSObjectController out of it? After editing, > the object has already been updated.
Yes, you're missing the point :-) My rubbish example was to demonstrate that you might want to access the object that is the content of an NSObjectController, as that my be the only way to determine which object is being edited. Or am I missing your point? :-) Joanna -- Joanna Carter Carter Consulting _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
